Californians For Justice Education Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943256009
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4082720236
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Voter Education, Registration
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,392,528
- Expenses
- $9,438,218
- Assets
- $13,150,519
- Liabilities
- $2,198,612
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Mauro Sifuentes Osborne (Co-ED): $168,770 total reported compensation
- Julie Sims (Senior Director): $132,078 total reported compensation
- Usman Gulzar (Senior Director): $125,141 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Californians for Justice is a statewide grassroots organization working for racial justice by building the power of youth, communities of color, immigrants, low-income families, and LGBTQ communities. Led by students, we organize to advance educational justice and improve our social, economic, and political conditions. Through year-round leadership development opportunities and intensive leadership programs, we empower the young people most affected by inequity to drive the process of change with their participation and ideas for a just society.
What it reported doing in 2024
Youth Engagement and Impact Metrics CFJ's vision is centered on empowering youth voice and elevating youth power. In 2024, we demonstrated this commitment through various programs and achievements:- Youth Priorities Survey: After surveying 417 students across the state, CFJ youth members identified key priorities for their educational experience. The majority of youth agreed that youth voice is critical to: Budgets (77%), Curriculum (73%), School Policies (77%), School Climate (81%), and School Board Elections (72%).- Broad Youth Engagement: 300 studentscomprising active leaders, interns, and core memberswere engaged in CFJs organizing and advocacy efforts across its four regions: Oakland, San Jose, Fresno, and Long Beach.- Leadership Skill Growth: Over 90% of students reported that their leadership, organizing, and advocacy skills grew as a result of their participation in CFJs leadership programs.- Program Participation: 150 students participated in the Summer Youth Leadership Academy (SYLA) and the statewide Student Leadership Retreat (SLR). - SYLA 2024: 40% of participants were first-time attendees, while 40% were returning participants. Feedback from SYLA 2024 participants was generally positive, with reported growth in leadership skills, political knowledge, and confidence. Topics like Palestine, anti-blackness, and capitalism were appreciated. Some areas for improvement included the application process, paperwork, and session organization. - SLR 2024: 34% of participants were new, and 66% were returning.- Oakland Youth Vote Win: In 2024, CFJ, in coalition with community partners, celebrated a historic victory where Oakland youth gained the ability to vote in their school board elections. This achievement was the result of years of coalition work following the passage of Measure QQ in 2020.- Legislative Advocacy in Capitol: CFJ began rebuilding its practice of youth power building at the State Capitol in 2024. - Six youth leaders represented CFJ at their first Youth Power Capitol Day, establishing 14 legislative connections. - These youth leaders presented and advocated for three bills, with two advancing to the next legislative stage and one being signed into law. - The signed bill, SB483, prohibits the use of "prone restraint," a harmful physical restraint, in school settings, contributing to the transformation of schools into places of healing and opportunity.- Working to Amplify the Voices of Youth (WAVY): The WAVY program in Fall 2024 aimed to introduce new members to CFJ's work, deepen leadership skills for returning members, and provide opportunities for interns to practice outreach and facilitation. Key sessions included Community Organizing 101, Youth-Led Democracy, Solidarity, Intersectionality, Racial Justice, and understanding CFJ's leadership pathway.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 84% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.7%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.86 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.4%; rating input score 96; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -47.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.39; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.7% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $169K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $171K reported
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.