Inland Congregations United for Change Sponsoring Committee Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330480298
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Bernardino, CA, USA
Phone
9093831134
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,917,003
Expenses
$4,048,684
Assets
$4,239,141
Liabilities
$425,150

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Gernaro Waheed (President)
  • Dawn Thomas (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Beatriz Loera (Trustee)
  • Ada Trujillo (Trustee)
  • Ana Chavez (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

ICUC empowers people to participate in civic decision-making. ICUC employs community organizing to be a vehicle of social change. Our goals include community betterment objectives, increasing the civic capacity of our member congregations, and leadership development.

What it reported doing in 2024

This year, ICUC leaders dedicated hundreds of hours working to support new programs in schools in the region. Our education campaign engaged 12 schools and 15 congregations in all 5 regions in three principal areas that support academic success and college readiness. These are district accountability for increased parent engagement, support for English learners, and increasing college readiness. We have won district support on all three issues and have strong participation in district efforts to dedicate funding to address these concerns. Inland parents, students, churches and academic officials joined together to work toward increasing high school graduation and college-going rates. The Inland Empire P16 Partnership for Education was formally unveiled Aug. 15. Beginning in preschool and through high school, the program seeks to engage parents to support academic success in the K12 system and college readiness. ICUC serves as the convener of the partnership and advocates for policy and program changes which will increase parent engagement, AG completion, college readiness, community college to four year university transfer rates, and decrease the need for remediation for incoming college students. Our health access campaign engages 21 congregations in all five regions and is four months into a yearlong process to enroll 10,000 ICUC leaders in expanded health care coverage and to address local and statewide issues that restrict access to health care. This campaign is coordinated with 12 PICO affiliates in California. Our racial justice campaign began 6 months ago and is still in the process of engaging more congregational leadership. Currently we have 7 schools and two congregations working to change school discipline policies with success in four districts and we are building leadership to contribute to the PICO National campaign to stop mass incarceration. In our immigrant rights campaign we have 18 congregations actively supporting national immigration reform and local issues related to immigrant rights. We play a lead role in the state and national campaigns on this issue and contributed to two major legislative victories this year and three local policy changes. ICUC leaders and congregations have dedicated thousands of hours to support immigration reform for millions of immigrants. We have had participation in the organizing efforts from over 12 member congregations and participation from over 1,200 Catholic parishioners. We have involved the faith community in over 50 different activities including pilgrimages, fasting, prayer, press conferences, canvassing and phone banking.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 79% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 77.2%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 35.3%; rating input score 35; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -38.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 17 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 35/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.