California Community Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953510055
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Phone
- 213-413-4130
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $386,569,507
- Expenses
- $374,749,849
- Assets
- $2,348,431,618
- Liabilities
- $277,432,594
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
36 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIGUEL SANTANA (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MIGUEL SANTANA (PRESIDENT & CEO): $731,053 total reported compensation
- STEVEN COBB (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $472,200 total reported compensation
- CAROL BRADFORD WORLEY (GENERAL COUNSEL/ASST BOARD SEC): $380,740 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We invest in, partner with, and amplify the power of community toward a good life. This coalition of housing advocates and nonprofit developers is driving equitable housing policies across Los Angeles. The coalition works to: Accelerate approval processes for affordable housing projects. Empower historically disadvantaged communities to shape housing policy. Open exclusive neighborhoods and prevent displacement in vulnerable areas. LA4LA LA4LA combines philanthropic flexibility with private investment and government support to deliver affordable housing faster. In partnership with LA Mayor Karen Bass, the initiative tackles financing barriers and high costs that slow housing construction. Key features include: Developing innovative financing tools to secure and lease housi.
What it reported doing in 2024
Understanding the needs and nonprofits of greater los angeles has enabled ccf to attract and concentrate resources on priority areas while also responding to opportunities and challenges that arise. Education: grants were made to increase school readiness through early care and education, improve teacher professional development and expand parental engagement in public education. Early education grantmaking reflects a multi-year effort to improve access to high quality preschool education for families in historically underserved communities. The los angeles scholarship investment fund supported programs that combine multi-year scholarships with additional support that's proven to help students graduate. The ready to rise initiative is a public private partnership investing in community-based organizations grounded in positive youth development.health care: grants were distributed to increase access to a regular source of preventive care and treatment services for uninsured adults and expanding coverage for all uninsured children. The trauma prevention partnership initiative worked to prevent violent incidents, address factors contributing to violence, and increase access to trauma informed care and health centered services and supports, through a public private partnership model. Housing and economic opportunity: grants were made to nonprofit housing developers and policy and advocacy groups to increase the availability of permanent, affordable housing units in stable neighborhoods for low-income households, preserve existing units, and protect tenants from displacement.civic engagement: ccf understands that grant dollars alone are not enough to address complex regional issues. Ccf has taken greater steps to form and support partnerships that motivate and empower diverse groups of local residents to participate in the civic life of their communities. Grants were made in the areas of civic leadership development and civics education, community engagement, open and responsive government, regional recovery, and to support research that provided communities with the necessary information to identify problems and promote solutions. Other program areas: provided funds enabling other initiatives not highlighted above to help bridge the gap between the community and its challenges.wildfire recovery: grants were made to more than 200 trusted nonprofits following the 2025 wildfires, providing cash, food, shelter and other essential services. Response addressed urgent needs while strengthening long-term recovery efforts. Ccf also provided direct cash aid to address the financial strain, insurance gaps and mental health needs of fire survivors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 97
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $80.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.2%; rating input score 95; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.27; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $354.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $731K · 36 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
- Consistency: 44 of 45 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2190 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2188 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.