Bryn Mawr Rehabilitation Hospital
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232110812
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2009
- Forms available
- Form 990 2009
- Location
- Bryn Mawr, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4843378480
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Hospital, Specialty
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,120,562
- Expenses
- $58,367,487
- Assets
- $159,687,960
- Liabilities
- $37,000,359
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2009. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bryn Mawr Rehabilitation Hospital is dedicated to serving individuals and families whose lives can be enhanced through physical or cognitive rehabilitation.
What it reported doing in 2009
Brain Injury Medical Rehabilitation: Bryn Mawr Rehabilitation Hospital has a full continuum of care for people who have experienced a brain injury. This system includes acute inpatient services, outpatient services, Day Treatment, community re-entry services and Family Support Groups. Our brain injury patients range in age from 16 to 86 and our average inpatient stay is 23 days. Our patients come from all over the Philadelphia area as well as across the nation. All of our patients receive care 24 hours a day from physicians and nurses specially trained in rehabilitation. Our patients receive therapy seven days a week. Additional services such as speech therapy, psychology, cognitive retraining, and recreational therapy are provided based on our assessment of each patient's individual needs. Our care is family-focused and includes conferences with the treatment team and on-going participation in care giving. Many specialized services are available including Day Treatment for full or half days, Adapted Driving with evaluations and recommendations, Assistive Technology for specialized wheelchairs and electronic speech devices, Aquatic Therapy, Pain management Rehab works for work-related injuries, Vestibular (balance) therapy, and outpatient services at several convenient locations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.9%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.74; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 2 of 3 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $45.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 15 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.