Main Line Health Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232331531
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Radnor, PA, USA
Phone
4843371864
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,566,018
Expenses
$9,422,536
Assets
$71,196,095
Liabilities
$14,962,644

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

32 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN J LYNCH III (PRES & CEO (UNTIL JUNE 2025))
  • EDWARD JIMENEZ (PRES & CEO (START JUNE 2025))

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN J LYNCH III (PRES & CEO (UNTIL JUNE 2025)): $3,302,622 total reported compensation
  • BARBARA WADSWORTH (EVP & COO): $1,391,882 total reported compensation
  • Leigh Ehrlich (EVP, CFO, & TREASURER): $1,129,933 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Main line health, inc. Is the corporate parent of subsidiary health care organizations serving communities in southeastern Pennsylvania. Services provided by these subsidiary organizations include actue care, rehabilitaion care, substance abuse, homecare, hospice, primary physician and specialty care. Main line health, inc. Is not itself a provider of health care services. The parent of main line health, inc. Is main line health system. Main line health, inc. Does not provide medical services.

What it reported doing in 2024

Medical staff office a medical staff office department is contained within main line health, inc. For the administration, management, credentialing and coordinating continuing medical education of physicians including various hospital medical staff and advanced service providers including medical staff presidents, the campus chief physicians, and the system department chairmen of various hospitals' specialties.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 95
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.6%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 91.3%; rating input score 91; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.56; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.6% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 21 of 23 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $3.3M · 32 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $4.3M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 29 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.