Bayview Senior Housing
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208289146
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- The Woodlands, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2813632600
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $506,661
- Expenses
- $612,350
- Assets
- $6,155,271
- Liabilities
- $70,498
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MR RONALD E JENNETTE (PRESIDENT)
- MR HAROLD ERMSHAR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MR MATTHEW CURRIE (VP/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MR RONALD E JENNETTE (PRESIDENT): $288,177 total reported compensation
- MR CHUCK CHILDRESS (SR VP OF OPERATIONS): $167,743 total reported compensation
- MR DON STEPHENS (CFO): $162,672 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is committed to quality living for senior adults in a faith-based environment. The organization takes great pride in being an important part of the broader, local community where it serves seniors and provides local employment in meeting its mission of service ministry to senior adults. The covenant connection with the Texas annual conference of united methodists links the organization to its heritage and origin, though the organization openly accepts persons of all faiths and beliefs; with no discrimination toward residents, staff, board members, volunteers, donors, vendors, etc. The organization accepts donations, usually through the mrc foundation, to assist and retain residents who outlive their resources and run low on funds or eventually even out of money through no fault of their own. The organization provides services, programs, activities, care and housing to seniors in independent/residential living apartments, assisted living apartments, specialty memory sup
What it reported doing in 2015
Bayview senior housing (the project) is a nonprofit, tax exempt organization operating a 61-unit apartment complex for the elderly in laporte, Texas. The project is operated under section 202 of the national housing act and regulated by the u.s. Department of housing and urban development (hud) with respect to rental charges and operating methods. The project received a hud section 202 capital advance which places certain conditions on the project for a period of 40 years. The project's section 202 capital advance is considered a major program. The project is also subject to a project rental assistance contract (prac) with hud, and a significant portion of the project's rental income is received from hud. The project's prac rent subsidy is considered a nonmajor program. The project is sponsored and managed by methodist retirement communities (mrc), who also appoints the board of directors of the project.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.2%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 64.7%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.05; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.2% of revenue deployed · 64.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $396K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $288K · 13 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 15 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.