Methodist Retirement Communities

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
741403088
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
The Woodlands, TX, USA
Phone
2813632600
Rating
51
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,574,029
Expenses
$5,615,034
Assets
$12,609,095
Liabilities
$825,538

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MR ALAN BROWN (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
  • MS AMY THOMAS (VP & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MR MATTHEW CURRIE (VP & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MS DEBORAH NUGENT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MR ALAN BROWN (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $549,037 total reported compensation
  • MR DON STEPHENS (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $297,923 total reported compensation
  • MS JILL JANES (VP OF SALES & MARKETING): $229,022 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's exempt purpose is to be the corporate and administrative headquarters for methodist retirement communities and its affiliated ministries.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization is the central support hub for methodist retirement communities and its affiliates, an organization committed to quality living for senior adults in faith-based environments. The organization takes great pride in seeing that our affiliates are an important part of the broader, local community where they serve seniors and provide employment in meeting our mission of service ministry to senior adults. The covenant connection with the Texas annual conference of united methodists links the organization to its heritage and origin, though the entire system openly accepts persons of all faiths and beliefs; with no discrimination toward residents, staff, board members, volunteers, donors, vendors, etc. The organization encourages donations to our foundation (continued on schedule o)to help our affiliates assist and retain residents who run low on funds or eventually even out of money through no fault of their own. The organization provides finance, accounting, human resources, technology, marketing, operations and executive & strategic planning leadership to the affiliates of mrc as the affiliates provide services, programs, activities, care and housing to seniors in independent/residential apartments (both market-rate and low-income), assisted living apartments, specialty memory support suites for those with alzheimer's and other dementias, skilled nursing & rehabilitation units, and home health & home services. The organization oversees the licensing whereby some of the organization's affiliates accept medicare, medicaid and/or hud payments along with private pay and certain insurance plans. The organization encourages its affiliates to also open its doors in its local broader community to periodically provide space use for other local nonprofits, such as lions, rotary, chamber, etc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.2%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0.2%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.7%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.25; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 34%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.2% of revenue deployed · 0.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $549K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $351K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.