Baylor Scott & White Health

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
751812652
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Dallas, TX, USA
Phone
1.866.218.6919
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$79,792,792
Expenses
$90,092,868
Assets
$1,784,135,245
Liabilities
$234,116,872

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Amy Wilson MD (President/CEO/Trustee)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jennifer Mitzner (Treasurer): $3,754,144 total reported compensation
  • Grant Teegarden (Secretary): $706,956 total reported compensation
  • Amy Wilson MD (President/CEO/Trustee): $644,044 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission Vision and Values

What it reported doing in 2024

See Schedule OBaylor Health Care System (BHCS) is a faith-based, nonprofit supporting organization formed in 1981 to provide centralized strategic and management services to an integrated health care delivery system. BHCS is now affiliated with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH), a faith-based nationally acclaimed network of acute care hospitals and related health care entities providing quality patient care, medical education, medical research and other community services to the residents of North and Central Texas. As the largest not-for-profit health care system in Texas and one of the largest in the United States, BSWH was born from the 2013 combination of Baylor Health Care System and Scott & White Healthcare. Today, BSWH has over 1,300 patient access points including 53 hospitals, 600+ specialty care clinics, 250+ outpatient clinics, 150+ primary care clinics, 29 pharmacies, 30+ ambulatory surgery centers, 60+ urgent care clinics, and over 7,300 active physicians. The system also includes a state certified health maintenance organization, the Scott and White Health Plan and the Baylor Scott & White Quality Alliance accountable care organization both covering approximately 1,200,000 lives.BHCS's governing body is comprised of volunteer community representatives who provide leadership and governance to BHCS. The members of the governing body contribute their wisdom, insights, and expertise to ensure that BHCS is fulfilling its mission and charitable purpose while providing efficient administrative support services and direction to affiliates of both BHCS and BSWH.As part of its mission, BHCS provides grants and other assistance to BSWH's nonprofit organizations that are religious, charitable, scientific, or educational in nature, within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, BSWH promotes the well-being of individuals, families and communities. During the fiscal year, BHCS provided more than $39 Million of assistance to affiliated nonprofit organizations.BSWH is committed to offering access to quality health care including free or discounted health care to the indigent and underserved population through its affiliated health care providers. As part of its charitable mission, BSWH's nonprofit hospitals provided community benefits (as reported to the Texas Department of State Health Services and in accordance with the State of Texas statutory methodology) of $1.3 Billion which includes the unreimbursed cost of charity care, Medicaid, Medicare and other community benefits. BSWH's nonprofit hospitals provided community benefits (as reported on Form 990, Schedule H) of $485 Million during the tax year, which included the unreimbursed cost of charity care, Medicaid and other community benefits, but excludes Medicare.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 56% for direct work, and 44% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 61
  • Accountability: 78
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.8; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.8% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $90.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $3.8M · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $132M reported
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 114 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.