Banner – University Family Care

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463766901
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
800-582-8686
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,956,614,522
Expenses
$1,896,908,674
Assets
$530,402,142
Liabilities
$308,018,174

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHARLES LEHN (DIRECTOR/DIVISION PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES STRINGHAM (Director/Vice President/CEO)
  • CLINTON CLARKE (VICE PRESIDENT/CMO)
  • MATT HALL (Executive Director, IT INSURANCE DIVISION)
  • MIKE BRADY (Executive Director, CFO Medicaid)
  • ZACARY ATERS (Executive Director, CHIEF ACTUARY)

Highest reported compensation

  • JEAN FITTERER LANCE (SECRETARY): $2,926,123 total reported compensation
  • CHARLES LEHN (DIRECTOR/DIVISION PRESIDENT): $1,691,122 total reported compensation
  • JAMES STRINGHAM (Director/Vice President/CEO): $1,144,537 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Make healthcare easier

What it reported doing in 2024

Banner University Family Care ("BUFC") COORDINATES THE DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE TO ENROLLEES UNDER A CONTRACT WITH THE ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (AHCCS), Arizona's Medicaid program. BUFC coordinates care between providers and acts to improve healthcare outcomes for members in an integrated fashion. BUFC's programs are developed to help improve the health and care of members and communities. This is accomplished through the provision of high-quality, coordinated services and the continual evaluation of programs. BUFC offers programs that provide support to both health plan members and the communities served, efforts driven by our mission, which is to make health care easier, so life can be better. Focusing on both physical and mental health needs, integrated Clinics treat physical health and behavioral health all in one place. These clinics: - Focus on Whole Person care - Treat both physical health and emotional health needs - Allow cross providers communication - Provide different health and social services in one place Our service areas include these counties in Arizona: - Central Region - Gila, Maricopa, Pinal - Southern Region - Cochise, Graham, Greenlee, La Paz, Pima, Santa Cruz, Yuma To help us fulfill our mission to make health care easier, so life can be better, BUFC Community Reinvestment Program provides philanthropic support to community-based organizations to improve access to both high-quality health care and community-based services which address the health-related social needs. BUFC is Arizona's only non-profit and locally based Medicaid plan and is committed to giving back through the community reinvestment program known as Banner has HEART. Since its inception in 2020, Banner has HEART funded 200+ programs and invested $22M into the communities we serve, providing essential support and building trust to those in greatest need. In 2024, BUFC received 147 applications and funded 61 programs aimed at addressing health-related social needs with an emphasis on helping to reduce barriers vulnerable communities face in maintaining their highest level of health. The funding is distributed to community organizations actively working to address vital community obstacles such as: access to care, basic needs, emergency assistance, food insecurity, housing, social support to combat isolation, workforce development and employment as well as youth and family services. Community Reinvestments: - Foundation for Senior Living - delivers thousands of meals to those in the Phoenix metropolitan area - Hushabye Nursery - provides resources for families and children experiencing neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome - Emerge! Center - provides shelter for nearly 5,000 people experiencing domestic abuse - Pima Council on Aging - provides essential resources, including transportation for 3,000+ people - Ronal McDonal House Charities - provides housing for 1000! Families in need of housing during their children's medical treatment

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 47
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 90.5%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.28; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 88% of revenue deployed · 90.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 6 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7B in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $2.9M · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.