Augusta Health
Legal name: Augusta Medical Group
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262559916
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fishersville, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5404806336
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $79,798,660
- Expenses
- $121,316,132
- Assets
- $10,734,746
- Liabilities
- $319,622,739
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mary N Mannix (CEO/Vice Chair)
- Kristopher Doan (President - AMG - started 6/3/2024)
Highest reported compensation
- Mary N Mannix (CEO/Vice Chair): $1,368,815 total reported compensation
- James Chadduck MD (Physician): $1,233,541 total reported compensation
- Glenn Brammer MD (Physician): $1,224,870 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The strength of Augusta Health is based on our commitment to teamwork. We have the greatest success in fulfilling our mission and serving our community when we work together and have a collective stake in our successes and failures. Driving Strategies To achieve our vision, the path forward is defined through four strategies:. Our Mission, Vision & Values Mission To strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities. Mission To strengthen the health and well-being of all people in our communities. Vision.
What it reported doing in 2024
Augusta medical group is a Virginia nonstock corporation that is organized and operated to support the charitable purposes of augusta health care, inc. Please see the continuation of our program service accomplishments on schedule o.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 54
- Sustainability: 2
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.3%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 22.2%; rating input score 22; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -52%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 29.77; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $116.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 17 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $9.4M reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.