Association for Healthcare Philanthropy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237148218
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Arlington, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7035326243
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,579,647
- Expenses
- $5,043,317
- Assets
- $8,357,159
- Liabilities
- $3,894,575
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALICE AYRES MBA (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ALICE AYRES MBA (PRESIDENT/CEO): $711,853 total reported compensation
- NORMAN FLORES (CFO): $259,601 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER LOVE CHIEF CONTENT (MARKETING OFFICER): $241,042 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ahp is an international association whose mission is to inspire, educate, and serve those transforming healthcare through philanthropy. It does this by: enhancing the effective performance and professionalism of its members; promoting the importance of philanthropy, volunteerism, and the role of not-for-profit healthcare institutions and organizations; providing comprehensive education and accreditation programs of recognized value; strengthening the ability of healthcare institutions and organizations to attract resources through professional development efforts; fostering adherence to established professional standards, ethical conduct, and a commitment to service; facilitating and promoting the sharing of expertise among colleagues in a spirit of cooperation and mutual respect; encouraging the establishment of comprehensive development programs in healthcare institutions and organizations; strengthening the association's position as the primary authority on healthcare philanthropy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Marketing and communications: ahp publishes, among others, a bi-weekly news brief, an association newsletter, a journal, white papers, industry data, compensation reports, trends, and benchmarks. The ahp website (www.ahp.org) provides the latest information on industry best practices, educational events, publications, certification/recognition programs, a resource center, online communities, government relations activities, member benefits, and services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.6%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.47; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $712K · 16 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $613K reported
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes foreign activity and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.