Ahp Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237359389
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Phone
7035326243
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,349
Expenses
$57,139
Assets
$551,965
Liabilities
$126,807

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALICE AYRES MBA (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALICE AYRES MBA (PRESIDENT/CEO): $711,853 total reported compensation
  • NORMAN FLORES (CFO): $259,601 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER LOVE (CHIEF CONTENT & MARKETING): $241,042 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the ahp foundation is to assist in providing continuing education and to provide grants to individuals or organizations, including nonprofit health care institutions, for education, research, and other charitable, educational, and scientific programs in order to increase awareness of the need to support our nation's health care institutions with voluntary financial support. The ahp foundation will support, facilitate, and enhance the mission and purposes of the association for healthcare philanthropy.

What it reported doing in 2024

Other program services include the pooled income fund. The foundation is the trustee and agent for amounts contributed to its pooled income fund investments (pif). The pif is comprised of irrevocable split-interest agreements in which a donor contributes an amount to the trust and, in exchange, receives a life annuity. Each annuity is based on the total rate of return of the fund each quarter and is allocated based on a pro rata share of units held at the end of each quarter. Upon the donor's death, the trust distributes the funds to the participating healthcare organization that the donor has designated.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 70% for direct work, and 30% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 53.9%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 46.3%; rating input score 46
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.8%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.66; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 218.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 53.9% of revenue deployed · 46.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $26K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $712K · 13 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.