Aspirus Health
Legal name: Aspirus Doctors Clinic Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391972671
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2012
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Wausau, WI, US
- Phone
- 800-283-2881
- Rating
- 32
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $54,873
- Expenses
- $16,492
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Treat each person in the best way possible. Hour by hour and moment by moment.
What it reported doing in 2012
To provide health care and education services to patients regardless of their ability to pay. The company provides healthcare to patients who meet certain criteria under its community care policy. Aspirus doctors clinic, inc. Transferred operations of the clinic on june 30, 2013 to aspirus clinics, inc. (affiliated organization). The transfer of operations to the new clinic were done in conjunction with opening and moving to a new modern clinic facility in Wisconsin rapids, Wisconsin in an effort to provide more coordinated care and services to patients within the aspirus system and in the community. The new clinic also provides services that were not offered at the old clinic such as advanced diagnostic mri services and inhouse surgical services. Effective june 30, 2013, the corporation was liquidated and dissolved in accordance with the Wisconsin nonstock corporation law. See schedule n to the form 990-ez for additional information on the operations of aspirus doctors clinic, inc. For fiscal year 2013.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 2
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.8%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 3
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 69.9%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -120.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -144.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 0.8% of revenue deployed · 2.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $425 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.