Grand View Hospital Auxiliary
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237178363
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Ironwood, MI, USA
- Phone
- 9069326215
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,984
- Expenses
- $142,374
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAROL D'ALBERTO (PRESIDENT)
- JULIE LUCAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CAROL D'ALBERTO (PRESIDENT)
- JULIE LUCAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CARRIE KIRTLAND (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We heal people, promote health and strengthen communities.
What it reported doing in 2018
The primary mission of grand view hospital auxiliary is to support aspirus ironwood hospital & clinics and its mission to improve the health of ironwood, Michigan and the surrounding communities. Profits from operations are donated to aspirus ironwood hospital & clinics in order to help defray the cost of new equipment.the pink lady gift shop is committed to excellence in retailing by offering a wide selection of merchandise at fair market prices with the highest level of customer service and satisfaction. As a fund raising service, gift shop income is used solely to support aspirus ironwood hospital & clinics and is managed and staffed by a group of volunteers and auxiliary members. The pink lady gift shop is located on the first floor of aspirus ironwood hospital & clinics. It carries a wide range of fresh flowers, plants, gift items, toiletries, greeting cards, candy, paperback books, and baby items.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 89% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Sustainability: 3
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.2%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 16%; rating input score 16
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -307%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.9% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 65.2% of revenue deployed · 16% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.