Asian Law Caucus

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942176139
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4158961701
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Interest Law

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,570,497
Expenses
$14,563,974
Assets
$35,219,286
Liabilities
$2,335,672

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Aarti Kohli (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • Aarti Kohli (Executive Director): $281,155 total reported compensation
  • Winifred Kao (Sr. Staff Attorney/Program): $234,283 total reported compensation
  • Lily Wang (Deputy Director): $227,697 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist in the United States. ALC is committed to the pursuit of equality and justice for all sectors of our society with a specific focus directed toward addressing the needs of low-income, immigrant, and underserved AAPIs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Housing Rights: The Asian Law Caucus's Housing Rights program provides legal services and advocacy on behalf of low-income residents in matters related to housing and community development. The program primarily serves low-income communities of color and immigrant communities, with a particular focus on San Francisco, including Chinatown, where residents face displacement due to rising housing costs and economic pressures.Through direct legal services, the organization assists tenants and community members in maintaining housing stability. This work informs its policy advocacy at the local and state levels, where the program promotes tenant protections, preservation of existing housing, development of affordable housing, and efforts to reduce inequities in housing and land use.Workers Rights: The Asian Law Caucus's Workers' Rights program provides legal counseling, direct representation, policy advocacy, and impact litigation to support low-income immigrant workers. The program addresses a range of workplace issues, including discrimination based on race and national origin, retaliation, wage and hour violations, unemployment insurance appeals, and workplace safety concerns.The organization collaborates with worker centers and community partners to support workplace organizing, worker-led campaigns, and leadership development among immigrant workers. In recent years, the program has achieved favorable outcomes in wage enforcement cases, helping to recover millions of dollars in unpaid wages for low-wage workers in coordination with state and local labor enforcement agencies and community-based organizations.Special Project: State Power Building -Since 2022, the Asian Law Caucus has collaborated with partner organizations, including Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders for Civic Empowerment Education Fund, Chinese for Affirmative Action, and Chinese Progressive Association, to identify priorities for strengthening community infrastructure in California and supporting long-term capacity building among low-income and underserved Asian American communities.In 2023, the organization co-led interviews with community leaders to inform the development of a strategic framework for a statewide network of organizations focused on economic opportunity, immigrant-related issues, and civic participation. In 2024, this framework was refined to address evolving policy conditions and to support increased engagement at the state and local levels.Building on these efforts, the Asian Law Caucus serves as a co-lead of Movement Solidarity Among AAPI Communities (MOSAIC), a coalition launched in 2025 that brings together organizations engaged in direct services, community organizing, policy advocacy, research, and coalition building. The initiative supports coordination across regions and sectors to strengthen collaborative efforts addressing racial and economic disparities in California.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.8%; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.42; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $12.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $281K · 23 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $871K reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 23 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.