Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Chicago
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363844385
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7732710899
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ethnic Studies
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,226,415
- Expenses
- $2,044,628
- Assets
- $10,851,871
- Liabilities
- $585,170
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GRACE PAI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- GRACE PAI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $110,308 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of asian americans advancing justice-chicago, an affiliate member of advancing justice, is to build power through collective advocacy and organizing to achieve racial equity.
What it reported doing in 2024
Civic engagement: we organize our communities in Illinois and across the midwest to be engaged year-round in order to grow our power. We get out the vote during election seasons, educate our communities on issues, and mobilize community members to win campaigns.elections are one of the ways that we exercise our power as a community. We conductseasonal get out the vote campaigns with the pan-asian voter empowerment (pave) coalition to register, educate, and engage the asian american and immigrant communities to show up and display our power on election day.asian american and immigrant communities have historically faced barriers that prevent participation in elections. We protect our communities' rights to vote by recruiting, training, and deploying volunteer poll monitors to over 100 precincts every election day to ensure that voters' rights are protected.asian americans face a unique set of challenges in chicago and across the state. We educate our communities year-round on issues and current events, promoting action beyond election season.every year, we organize a legislative advocacy day in springfield with our partners in the pave coalition. Over 300 asian american community members participate annually to rally and meet with elected officials at the state capitol on issues that affect our communities.a complete census count ensures that our communities get the resources and representation that they deserve. Historically, asian american and pacific islanders are among those most likely to be undercounted. In the 2020 decennial census, we will be working to educate our communities and get a complete count of aapi communities in Illinois.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.3%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 76.9%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.2%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.31; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.3% of revenue deployed · 76.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.