Area Vii Physicians Review Organization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222169496
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- East Brunswick, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7322385570
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $126,800
- Expenses
- $393,853
- Assets
- $1,853,563
- Liabilities
- $42,393
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID KINGSLEY (PRESIDENT)
- VALERIE AIELLO (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- VALERIE AIELLO (CEO): $240,201 total reported compensation
- JAMES MADDEN (TRUSTEE): $5,700 total reported compensation
- MARTIN MARGOLIES (TREASURER): $4,800 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of this corporation is to improve the quality of the practice of medicine by developing new methodology and procedures to quantify and qualify projects to improve the quality of medical care, to publish articles related to research and educational efforts related to medical care and the practice of medicine, to maintain a library related to medical care and quality there of, and to engage in any other activity reasonably related to an organization comprised of physicians. In addition, the corporation will also be empowered to establish a legislative commitee to communicate the corporation's attitudes to state and local government officials on issues germane to its members' professional interests such as professional incorporation legislation, medicare legislation, and compulsory healthcare legislation, and to hold meetings concerned with matters affecting the promotion and protection of the practice of medicine, and to conduct public relations programs to enhance and impr
What it reported doing in 2024
All grants and scholarships were used by the recipients to further medical education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 61
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -210.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.71; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $240K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 17 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 21 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.