New Hope Integrated Behavioral Health Care Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222116914
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Marlboro, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7329463030
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,792,386
- Expenses
- $22,213,973
- Assets
- $26,394,593
- Liabilities
- $3,753,514
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID RODEN (PRESIDENT)
- DR ANTHONY COMERFORD PHD (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- DR ANTHONY COMERFORD PHD (CEO): $384,144 total reported compensation
- DAVID RODEN (PRESIDENT): $362,287 total reported compensation
- DEIDRE LONZA (VP & CCO): $315,508 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
New hope integrated behavioral health care, inc., a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, provides commission on the accreditation of rehabilitation facilities (carf) and nj licensed substance use and co-occurring mental health disorder treatment.new hope provides substance use, gambling, and other co-occuring mental health disorder treatments to adults and adolescents in central New Jersey facilities. Treatment plans are drawn from a full range of therapies to insure a thorough and flexible approach to delivering care in quantities and combinations that specifically meet the needs of individual patients. This ensures that patients receive the specific medical, psychiatric, psychological, counseling, family and other adjunct services called for to begin and sustain a meaningful recovery. New hope stays abreast of new and promising practices for consideration and recognizes the role that the many advances in pharmaceutical adjuncts can play in support of an early and ongoing recovery.
What it reported doing in 2025
New hope's services include medical, psychiatric, psychological, social work, counseling and family therapies and it provides withdrawal management, short term residential, outpatient, intensive outpatient and partial hospital services for both adults and adolescents in facilities in central New Jersey. Halfway house services are available for adult men and women to include women with dependent children. New hope also makes low income housing units available to support the continued recovery of those who qualify and can be accommodated.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 88.9%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.6%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 88.9% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $21M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $384K · 20 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.9M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.