Archie Bray Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810284022
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Helena, MT, USA
- Phone
- 4064433502
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,113,313
- Expenses
- $2,727,567
- Assets
- $9,015,869
- Liabilities
- $529,377
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUE TIRRELL (Past President)
- KIMBERLY FEIG (Vice President)
- BROOKS OLIVER (President)
Highest reported compensation
- REBECCA HARVEY (Executive Dir.): $144,047 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To make available to all who are seriously interested in any branch of the ceramic arts, a fine place to work. The corporation will provide facilities for the creation of artistic works and association with other serious artists as the foundation for creative growth.
What it reported doing in 2024
The primary mission of the archie bray foundation (the "foundation"} is to provide an environment that stimulates creative work in ceramics - for artists, community members, teachers, students, children, cultural institutions, collectors, and the general public. The bray was founded in 1951 as the first residency program in the united states devoted to ceramics. To create a sustainable future for the bray, the abf fund was founded as a supporting foundation in 2022. Working together, the missions of the organizations are to allow the bray to provide an environment that stimulates, promotes, and exhibits innovative, creative work in ceramics. This is accomplished primarily through a year-round residency program. The organizations provide studio space, funding, and facilities for ceramic artists with diverse backgrounds, cultures, and aesthetic approaches to advance their work.through the public work of the bray, the organizations serve both the field of ceramic arts as well as the regional and local community through a variety of educational programs, exhibitions, a ceramic supply, public events, lectures, school tours, and a permanent collection of ceramics available for scholars interested in researching contemporary ceramics from the 60's to present time. On an international level, the organizations have served the field of ceramics by bringing together artists from around the world with talent, curiosity and commitment and providing them with the facilities and freedom to explore their creative voices.the organizations work together to allow the bray to offer ten long-term residencies that last for up to two years, ten summer residencies, and 6-8 short-term residencies throughout the year. Residents are selected annually from a pool of applicants by a rotating panel of three reviewers including the executive director. All residents receive free studio space, exhibition opportunities, discounted materials, and access to one of the top kiln-firing facilities in the united states.dedicated to serving the Montana and helena communities, the organizations host annual programming at the bray and in other venues which is free and open to the public, classes for vocational artists, and a continuing education program for more accomplished ceramicists taught by artists from around the world. Site-specific sculptures made by resident artists are featured throughout the 26-acre campus which is open to the public for a self-guided tour during daylight hours. School groups make requests for guided tours.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 61.9%; rating input score 62
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -29.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.31; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.3%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 61.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $144K · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.