Craft Emergency Relief Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133273980
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Brattleboro, VT, USA
Phone
8022292306
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,776,188
Expenses
$6,384,220
Assets
$4,669,256
Liabilities
$226,281

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • RUBY LOPEZ HARPER (EXECUTIVE DI): $151,638 total reported compensation
  • JAMES HAFFERMAN (DEPUTY DIREC): $127,402 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The craft emergency relief fund (cerf+) provides craft artists with support and resources for disaster and emergency relief, education programs, and readiness grants to strengthen preparedness. Committing to generosity, inclusion, and care, we advocate for the thriveability of craft artists and craft as an art form.

What it reported doing in 2024

Outreach, marketing & advocacy cerf+ maintains an active list of over 35,448 individuals, organizations, and arts businesses that receive email alerts before, during, and after a disaster. Cerf+ also sends e-newsletters on a regular basis to ensure that artists receive up-to-date information, including grant opportunities, educational resources, and federal and state assistance packages. Our increased social media engagement resulted in 13,900+ instagram followers (+1200), 8,300+ facebook followers (+100), and 687 linkedin (+126) followers. Cerf+ continues to play an active role as a steering committee member of the national coalition for arts' preparedness and emergency response (ncaper). Over the past year, ncaper has shifted focus back to response supporting groups during disaster events. We serve on the steering committee of the Vermont arts & culture disaster and resilience network, an initiative led by arts and culture organizations from across the state committed to deepening emergency preparedness and resilience within the arts and culture sector. Cerf+ participates in many nationwide cohorts of arts service organizations such as the living traditions network, a nationwide network of organizations and culture bearers focused on sharing and developing resources to support folk & traditional artists. And the heritage emergency national task force (hentf), sponsored by the smithsonian institution and fema, continues to increase recognition for our specialized expertise in artists disaster preparedness and recovery. We also participate in the national volunteer organizations active in disaster, appalachian funders network, world craft council, the cultural advocacy group and other national network/cohorts. These relationships are vital to inform and be informed around leading trends and evolving practices related to supporting individual artists. Cerf+ website and online content we continue to update our website with new content on a regular basis. After each major disaster in an area that affected a significant number of craft artists, cerf+ created a website banner that links to an updated disaster relief page with disaster response & recovery resources. Our website has been the go-to destination for artists seeking emergency resources. Cerf+ completed a comprehensive update of both content and graphics for all studio protector materials and developed a detailed guide to emergency preparedness for artists. Cerf+ greatly expanded its other resources page to include information about grants and trainings that other organizations offer to artists as well. We also maintain a "disaster resource hub," which provides alerts, information, and resources on specific disaster events. Other additions to the site include new craft artist interviews and stories as well as new content related to our get ready grant program created by recipients of those grants. We also updated the emergency relief information pages to include spanish translation. Our website is now included on many state, regional, and national arts agencies- and organizations' websites and blogs with disaster-specific information. Finally, we continued writing blog articles, which feature craft artists, organizations, and other topics relevant to our audience.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $5.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $152K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.