Angela's House
Legal name: Angela's House Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273470531
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Hauppauge, NY, USA
- Phone
- 631-979-2620
- Rating
- 51
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,438,623
- Expenses
- $1,515,860
- Assets
- $2,190,182
- Liabilities
- $2,122,853
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR JOSEPH MORRIS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- WALTER STOCKTON (TREASURER & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- WALTER STOCKTON (TREASURER & CEO): $807,372 total reported compensation
- MARY BETH LICHTNEGER (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $584,958 total reported compensation
- FRANK LOMBARDI (FORMER COO): $439,673 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To assist families caring for children that are medically fragile.
What it reported doing in 2024
Angela's house's foundation exempt mission is to identify families caring for their children who may have a severe disability or medical condition so that we may help them obtain supportive services to improve the quality of life for the children and their family. The angela's house foundation's "everyday wishes program" services medically fragile, technology dependent and chronically ill children. The association for technology dependent children, inc. D/b/a angela's house staff along with the angela's house foundation staff will identify the needs of each child and their family. The goal is to obtain all the supportive services needed to safely care for these children living at home with their parents or guardians, or the children that live in one of the three homes that we oversee along with our affiliate agency, independent group home living (ighl). We serviced 1222 children in 2024. The "everyday wishes program" will assist with medical supplies, equipment or services that cannot be funded by other means. Our staff will draft the brief background and description of need for each child. We have a committee that will determine which children and families are eligible and approve aid. Our program administrator will then process their request/wish. Angela's house may periodically provide funding to the organizations they are affiliated with, such as, ighl or other charitable programs that may align with angela's house mission.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 21.8%; rating input score 22
- Fundraising efficiency: $31.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.1%; rating input score 95; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 57.1%; rating input score 57; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.4%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.44; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.97; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 23% of revenue deployed · 21.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $330K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $807K · 10 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 23 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.