Center for Developmental Disabilities

What it reported doing in 2024

The center's adult residence program consists of 4 intermediate care facilities (icfs), which are the more traditional type of group homes governed by the New York state office for people with developmental disabilities (opwdd). Intermediate care facilities our intermediate care facilities are the center's larger residential facilities, with 8-12 people with developmental and intellectual disabilities living in a co-ed private home in diverse communities in nassau county. These homes are staffed 24 hours a day, and generally have a full-time house manager and assistant house manager assigned for oversight and day-to-day operational purposes. The center strives to make each residence a true, home-like environment while actively providing programming to each person on an individualized basis. The treatment team approach is used to assess a person's capabilities and needs for medical and clinical areas, as well as independent living, and community integration skills. Goals are developed to assist each person in achieving the maximum level of independence possible, which, in turn, may help the person be able to move to a less-restrictive environment in the future. The qidp (qualified intellectual disabilities professional) is charged with the development and monitoring of the person's overall plan of care, ensuring that a person's needs are met adequately and in a timely manner. The person-centered model of administering a treatment plan consisting of individualized goals and programming, ensures that the person is an active part of the planning process to the extent that s/he is capable - or wants - to participate. Clinical services, such as psychology and speech services, as well as nursing services, are part of the multi-faceted approach to the life-long learning and support offered in an icf setting. Family members are an integral part of the treatment team and are encouraged to be actively involved in the planning, and the everyday execution of the treatment plan. Consistency is key to an individual's success, therefore, the participation of family, especially while a loved one is on home visits, increases the success rate of the person. The staffing ratio in an icf is typically a 1:3 (1 staff to 3 residents) model, with variations based on the needs of the individuals living in the home. In addition, there is a 24-hour on-call system for staff to reach program and nursing administrators in the event that additional supports are required. The icf program provides opportunities to our residents that are "normalized", yet may have never been available in the past, as we strive for community inclusion in the neighborhoods in which we live and work. Seeking ideas and input from all people, a wide variety of choices are provided to encourage and introduce new and diverse interests.the adult residence program strives to involve each and every person and their family members in all aspects of the person's life: seeking a higher overall quality of life through community inclusion and skill acquisition, while maintaining quality programming. The never-ending quest for helping people with developmental / intellectual disabilities and autism in reaching increased levels of independence serves as an incentive for all staff, whether direct support or administration, to provide limitless support in a caring, home environment.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 90.9%; rating input score 91
• Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
• Fundraising efficiency: $29,986.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
  • Compensation committee: Missing
  • Independent consultant: Missing
  • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
  • Written employment contract: Missing
  • Compensation survey or study: Missing
  • Board or committee approval: Pass
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: Limited
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 90%; rating input score 90; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Fail
  • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings