American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Legal name: American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 136180380
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, United States
- Phone
- 5714831300
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $159,100,585
- Expenses
- $143,670,256
- Assets
- $321,716,381
- Liabilities
- $111,219,799
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
40 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EVERETT E VOKES MD (PAST PRESIDENT (PARTIAL YEAR))
- ERIC P WINER MD (CHAIR/PAST PRESIDENT)
- LYNN M SCHUCHTER MD (PRESIDENT/CHAIR)
- ROBIN ZON MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT/PRESIDENT)
- ERIC J SMALL MD (PRESIDENT-ELECT(PARTIAL YEAR))
- CLIFFORD A HUDIS MD (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- CLIFFORD A HUDIS MD (CEO): $1,139,916 total reported compensation
- DINA MICHELS ESQ (SECRETARY, EVP & COO): $758,120 total reported compensation
- JULIE R GRALOW MD (EVP & CMO): $705,268 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.
What it reported doing in 2024
Policy: in collaboration with volunteer experts, asco works to address a wide range of policy issues that impact the cancer care delivery system and people with cancer. Policy is conveyed in formal statements published in asco journals, and in public facing communications channels. Areas of focus include quality and access to care, insurance issues, cost, prevention, survivorship, reimbursement, and support for clinical cancer research. In 2024, asco continued to draw public attention to the persistent crisis of drug shortages, the ongoing and worsening harms related to aggressive utilization management practices, the need to sustain access to evidence based cancer care, the need to balance benefits/harms associated with use of artificial intelligence in cancer care, and the importance of telemedicine as a component of health care delivery.center for global impact (cgi): asco's international affairs department has transitioned to the center for global impact (cgi). Cgi partners across asco and oncology communities worldwide to integrate global perspectives into asco strategies and operations, and to catalyze and advance asco's global impact goals as directed by the society's mission, vision, and strategic plans. Cgi serves as a resource across asco for global issues relevant to asco, with a particular emphasis on volunteer engagement, diplomacy, strategic planning, program delivery, and global operations. Examples of operations are as follows:- joint sessions- international cancer corps- international courses- international development and education award (idea)scientific publications: asco produces a number of professional publications and general publications focused on clinical oncology. Asco publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed scientific papers in its journals: - journal of clinical oncology (jco)- jco oncology practice (jco op)- jco global oncology (jco go)- jco clinical cancer informatics (jco cci)- jco precision oncology (jco po)- jco oncology advances (jco oa)- asco daily newsasco also provides content and distribution lists for trade publications. While not owned or published by asco, the publications cover news and information of interest to the professional oncology community.education and professional development: in 2024, asco launched the inaugural leadership development program (ldp): latin america class of 12, creating a network of physician leaders to advance cancer care. In 2024, asco had record virtual mentoring program participation (68% increase), resulting in the creation of a technological solution to meet the demand. The in-training exam for oncology fellows had record participation with 2333 trainees from 20 countries across the globe participating. All programs serve the purpose of building the workforce.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.1%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 76.3%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 94.8%; rating input score 95; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.7%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.24; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 67.1% of revenue deployed · 76.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $109.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.1M · 40 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $23M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 37 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 23 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.