American Legion Post 82

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

6 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Programs designed to aid veterans who served in the us military

American legion riders, honor flight foundation, legion district 2g, mercy house, pa va hospital, pia sc, sons of al, toys 4 tots

Revenue model: Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Mission deployment rate: Limited
Program expense ratio: 27.3%; rating input score 27
Fundraising efficiency: $21.28 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: -970.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.98; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: 27.7% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -21.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: 27.3% of spending went to programs
Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $31K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
Consistency: 19 of 20 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 4 filed schedules
Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 27/100.
Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.