Alternatives Research and Development Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232740843
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Jenkintown, PA, USA
Phone
2158878076
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,391,661
Expenses
$947,409
Assets
$17,124,006
Liabilities
$105,402

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUE LEARY (PRESIDENT (PRIOR TO 10/7/25))
  • LUKE KLEIN (PRESIDENT (AFTER 10/7/25))
  • JOSEPH LUDWIG (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • LUKE KLEIN (PRESIDENT (AFTER 10/7/25)): $126,016 total reported compensation
  • SUE LEARY (PRESIDENT (PRIOR TO 10/7/25)): $58,791 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the ardf is to fund and promote the development, validation and adoption of non-animal methods in biomedical research, product testing, and education.

What it reported doing in 2025

The "annual open" grant program funds innovative non-animal methods to reduce or replace animal use in research and testingin 2025, ardf funded the following projects for scientific research: 1) engineered human heart models for advancing drug cardiac safety assessment; 2) in vitro modelling of bubble-assisted focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier opening; 3) an advanced ex vivo model for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; 4) replacing animal-derived products in drug development in vitro models; 5) immune disruptors and the developing brain: unraveling how immunotoxicants shape neurodevelopment; 6) advancing organoid intelligence with a hippocampal-cortical system; 7) generation of the olfactory epithelium from human pluripotent stem cells to study neurodegeneration; and 8) a human-relevant model for real-time monitoring of mycn-driven neuroblastoma spreading and drug testing. These projects reflect ardf's continued emphasis on supporting human-relevant, animal-free approaches for biomedical research and drug development, including cell- and tissue-based systems, organoid and stem cell technologies, computationally informed models, and other advanced in vitro and ex vivo methods. By supporting research to develop and advance alternative, animal-free models, ardf continues to promote both animal welfare and human health. Ardf also continued development of its alternatives in research challenge, a disease-focused grant initiative supporting non-animal approaches to childhood cancer research. Ardf also contributes its expertise to scientific and policy discussions concerning the advancement, validation, and adoption of non-animal methods. In 2025, ardf supported education, outreach, and scientific exchange to accelerate understanding of human-relevant approaches and to foster collaboration among researchers, policymakers, and other stakeholders.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, and 58% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 85
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 79.3%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Pass
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.9%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.07; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 79.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $751K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $126K · 8 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $148K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.