Aid Atlanta Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581537967
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4048707700
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- AIDS
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,493,546
- Expenses
- $10,875,712
- Assets
- $3,324,192
- Liabilities
- $2,421,221
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL WEINSTEIN (PRESIDENT)
- NICOLE ROEBUCK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL WEINSTEIN (PRESIDENT): $749,419 total reported compensation
- AHMED MOUSSA MD (ER PHYSICIAN): $338,007 total reported compensation
- NICOLE ROEBUCK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $192,663 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2025
Aid atlanta's third largest program is the prevention and education department. This department provides comprehensive HIV and sti prevention education and services to those most at risk for HIV. Those services include the provision of HIV counseling and testing and prep education, counseling and referrals to ensure individuals are aware of their HIV status and can make more informed choices about their sexual health to help protect them against contracting the HIV virus. Outreach activities are conducted primarily through our men engagement network(m.e.n.) team who provide outreach, education, prevention messaging, condom distribution and targeted offsite testing to targeted populations (including college campuses, bars, community venues, etc). This department also houses one of the oldest HIV hotline programs in the country, the Georgia HIV/sti information 1-800 hotline that provides comprehensive information, education and referrals to those seeking information about HIV/sti services in the state of Georgia and beyond. In 2024, this department collaborated with the AIDS healthcare foundation to provide 15,298 HIV tests, 50,464 sti screens with immediate access to linkage services into medical care, HIV treatment or prep intervention if needed. In 2024, the information hotline responded to 24,547 callers and the m.e.n. Team had 5000+ prevention and engagement encounters.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 68% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, and 25% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.9%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.73; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.9% of revenue deployed · 85.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $749K · 11 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $259K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 56/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.