AIDS Healthcare Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
954112121
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3238605200
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospices

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,193,782,492
Expenses
$2,089,338,653
Assets
$1,613,686,418
Liabilities
$303,647,777

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

42 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL WEINSTEIN (PRESIDENT)
  • PETER REIS (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL WEINSTEIN (PRESIDENT): $668,273 total reported compensation
  • CARL EVANS MILLNER (CHIEF MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $420,977 total reported compensation
  • BRYAN PATRICK SEBASTIAN GAUDIO (DEPUTY CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $375,107 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

AIDS Healthcare Foundation is a global nonprofit providing cutting-edge medicine and advocacy regardless of ability to pay. AIN (AIDS Interfaith Network d.b.a. Access and Information Network) is a multicultural, 501 (c) 3, non-profit organization providing services for individuals with chronic health conditions and prevention programs for at-risk communities. Through our mission, AIN works to prevent the spread of HIV and serves persons living with HIV/AIDS and other vulnerable populations. AIN has been serving low-income individuals in high levels of need for more than 30 years in Dallas and North Texas. Image AID Atlanta.

What it reported doing in 2024

Sustainable affordable housing for the homeless and low-income populations. In response to widespread gentrification and rising housing costs, which displaces ahf patients throughout California, Florida, and elsewhere, the foundation has launched the healthy housing foundation (hhf) to fulfill its public health mission. Hhf provides decent housing units at an affordable cost to low-income people, including families with children and those previously unsheltered or homeless. Ahf believes that a stable and affordable housing situation is critical for individuals with chronic health conditions, including HIV/AIDS.the foundation also creates and implements new programs in communities across the u.s. And abroad, and expands delivery of healthcare and influence over policy with the aim of saving more lives. During the year, the foundation provided grants worth over $17 million worldwide to organizations that promote HIV testing, awareness, prevention and treatment as well as emergency grants to provide small, community organizations relief to deliver vital services in their areas. Ahf's global advocacy team is committed to fighting for what is right and puts our clients' needs first every time, from leading the charge in demanding equal access to vaccines to helping low-income countries access lifesaving care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 97.2%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: $9.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Pass
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Pass
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Pass
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 52.6%; rating input score 53; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 93% of revenue deployed · 97.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2B in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $668K · 42 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $13.5M reported
  • Consistency: 44 of 45 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 12 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 58 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 56 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.