Zionsville Cultural District

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462056392
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Zionsville, IN, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Reported finances

Revenue
$52,206
Expenses
$64,900
Assets
$85,668

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Steve Mundy (President)
  • Mamata Patel (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Steve Mundy (President)
  • Candace Ulmer (Treasurer)
  • Mamata Patel (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The ZCD is a 501c3 Public Charity whose main emphasis is to promote the arts culture and history of Zionsville IN to its residents and visitors like. This is done by providing free summer concerts since 2013 artistic murals on local buildings when available and the SideWalk Poetry contest to Zionsville youth and winning poems are stamped into the sidewalks. These projects first economic development for the town,

What it reported doing in 2025

Summer Concert Series. Through grants sponsorships and donations we have been providing three months of Wednesday evening conters free of charge to the Zionsville Community. ZCD assumed the concerts in 2013 and has grown the program from two to three months and two venues to meet the needs of the residents. Also a childrens educational time before the concerts occurs during June and July.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 61% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.3%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.32; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -92.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.