Zions Bridge
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 815343918
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Alto, GA, USA
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Religion Related N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $243,286
- Expenses
- $209,667
- Assets
- $151,424
- Liabilities
- $3,931
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robert Coleman (President)
- Jeffrey Lovell (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Robert Coleman (President): $18,000 total reported compensation
- Debra Coleman (Secretary): $14,400 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Connecting hearts to Israel for a stronger faith in God.
What it reported doing in 2025
A major focus was providing essential security infrastructure, protective equipment, utility vehicles, generators, night-vision goggles, walkie-talkies, and fire-resistant gear for First Responders. We also supplied grocery gift cards to support families in vulnerable communities and conditions. Additional support included funding for rebuilding initiatives in war affected areas. Throughout the year, we delivered recurring humanitarian aid to trusted partners, including Passover and Sukkot food boxes, grocery assistance, and ongoing support for needy families, the elderly, and the wounded. We also provided direct assistance to individual families facing housing and daily needs, as well as to childrens ministry programs in Bethlehem and other vital outreaches. Through these efforts, Zions Bridge delivered tangible relief, enhanced safety and security, and spiritual encouragement to our brothers and sisters in Israel during a challenging season.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 9
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.5%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $210K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $18K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.