Zion Forever Project
Legal name: Zion Natural History Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870256961
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Springdale, UT, US
- Phone
- 435-772-3264
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,094,530
- Expenses
- $9,789,269
- Assets
- $22,673,329
- Liabilities
- $842,609
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NATALIE CAPPUCCIO-BRITT (PRESIDENT AN)
Highest reported compensation
- NATALIE CAPPUCCIO-BRITT (PRESIDENT AN): $274,120 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL FRANCE (CHIEF DEV OF): $246,610 total reported compensation
- CHRISTOPHER HORTON (COO): $231,731 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To conserve and enhance public lands in the Zion region for current and future generations by engaging communities, visitors, and partners.
What it reported doing in 2025
Enhancing the visitor experience through education initiatives: we continue to fund all of zion's education initiatives, including distance-learning programs that broadcast globally, bringing zion and zion rangers into classrooms around the world. Our junior ranger program engages 43,000 children annually, helping them explore and learn about the park. Additionally, our flagship programs, such as "concrete to canyon," bring title 1 schoolchildren into the park for their first zion experience and fund ranger visits to local classrooms, providing invaluable educational experiences. Zfp also funds southern Utah universitys (suu) intergovernmental internship cooperative (iic), which places students in public land positions across the region, offering hands-on experience and fostering the next generation of conservation leaders. Funding for search and rescue (sar) training programs: in 2025, zfp provided essential funding for various search and rescue (sar) training programs, enhancing the capabilities and preparedness of our responders. These comprehensive training sessions covered basic sar techniques, climbing and rappelling, swiftwater rescue, and psychological training. Acknowledging the tough conditions and challenging scenarios that sar teams encounter, we also emphasized mental health support for responders and caretakers. These programs ensure that our sar teams are not only equipped with the essential technical skills but also possess the emotional resilience needed to cope with the stresses of being on-site during critical incidents. This funding has significantly improved the safety and effectiveness of our sar operations, benefiting both the responders and the communities they serve. Partnering with the parks to ensure employee wellness: zfp offers free, confidential professional mental health support to national park service (nps) employees, zion forever staff, volunteers, and interns. This initiative includes weekly, hour-long sessions with licensed therapists focused on trauma therapy, stress management, and overall mental well- being. The program is part of a larger commitment to fostering a resilient, supportive workplace culture at zion forever and among the national park staff.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 71% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.3%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 67.8%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 30.5%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.32; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 96.3% of revenue deployed · 67.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $274K · 15 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.