Zeus Helping Hands Foundation F/K/A The Tourville Family Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
871541441
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Orangeburg, SC, USA
Phone
3152094906
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Corporate Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$54,013
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jennifer McQuesten (President and Director)
  • Steve Peterson (President)

People named in this filing

  • Scott Lloyd (Secretary and Director)
  • Jennifer McQuesten (President and Director)
  • Melvilyn Edwards (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide finanical support (or, when more appropriate, products and supplies) to Zeus Industrial Products, Inc., its parents, affiliates and subsidiaries (collectively "Zeus") employees, families, and individuals in communities in which Zeus operates during times of need caused by natural disaster, tragic events, medical events, or other unforeseen circumstances.

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide cash funds to persons who live in communities where Zeus Industrial Products, Inc. has a substantial presence to rebuild homes lost due to natural or man-made disaster. The organization has accomplished this service by providing funds to a Zeus Industrial Products, Inc. employee living in a community near the corporation's headquarters who was in need after his principal residence was lost by fire. This activity's current objective is to further the care of persons who live in communities Zeus Industrial Products, Inc. has a substantial presence with cash distributions to such persons.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: -118.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.