YWCAs of the Great Lakes Alliance Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
134224948
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Bloomington, IL, USA
Phone
3098286140
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$667,707
Expenses
$610,811
Assets
$953,444
Liabilities
$75,008

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Furthering and advancing the mission of the YWCA. Uniting local associations into an effective, continuing and growing organization for the fulfillment of the mission and aiding in the growth of the YWCA.

What it reported doing in 2012

Capacity Building The region works to build capacity of local associations to fulfill the YWCA mission and create community impacts to address racial justice and womens economic empowerment. Conducted onsite training for 12 associations on racial justice and womens economic empowerment helping them develop a logic model and following up to provide support toward implementation. Provided additional racial justice and womens economic empowerment consultation as needed. Delivered a four part mission 101 training via webinar four times and one part trainings on racial justice 6 times and womens economic empowerment 6 times. Provided a monthly racial justice affinity group and a bi-monthly womens economic empowerment affinity group. Developed an Action of Mission Process and delivered it live to YWCAs in each of the five states in the region. As part of the process, states identified an area of focus and developed an action plan to do the work. Delivered a four part webinar series on facility financing and a just in time board orientation webinar. A two day leadership academy

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.5%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.56; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 27.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -7.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 94 of 94 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $450K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $98K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.