Ywca - Southwestdelta Regional Council Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611426107
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 7734658772
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45
- Expenses
- $36,366
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
47 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KERI JONES (PRESIDENT)
- SUSIE INFANTE (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- AZURI GONZALEZ (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JAN PEERY (DIRECTOR)
- KATIE VANDERLICK (DIRECTOR)
- MARQUERIETE HUMPHREY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Organization was composed of local associations in the southwest region of the USA, and furthered the mission of the ywca of the USA. Also aided in the growth of the ywca movement by developing new associations for membership in the ywca and participate in the work of the world ywca. Organization built the capacity of member associations by providing support, technical assistance, and training to member associations and to developed and implemented objectives for the region.
What it reported doing in 2015
Provide services and meetings to regional associations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -80,713.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -119.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -92.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 47 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.