Ywca La Crosse Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
390810543
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
La Crosse, WI, USA
Phone
6087812783
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,081,168
Expenses
$1,964,114
Assets
$1,103,105
Liabilities
$262,440

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TRICIA JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
  • MARGARET HO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LAURIE COOPER STOLL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THROUGH MAY 2024)
  • ROSANNE NORTHWOOD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROSANNE NORTHWOOD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $69,231 total reported compensation
  • LAURIE COOPER STOLL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THROUGH MAY 2024): $41,441 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

What it reported doing in 2024

Supportive housing: yhdp - the youth homeless demonstration program provides case management, support, and navigation assistance through the complex housing system to 18-24 year old young adults. Yab - ywca la crosse has a system navigator, who works with the coulee youth advisory board (yab). Across the state of Wisconsin location yabs meet to center youth and young adult voices in the work to end youth homelessness. Yab members are between the ages of 14-24 years old. Ophelia house - a collaboration between ywca la crosse, justice support services and the department of justice. Ophelia house offers gender-specific programming designed to provide wraparound services for the women participating in the program. Services may include housing assistance, group opportunities such as thinking for a change, substance abuse services and support, educational groups, employment assistance, and enrichment opportunities. Residents work on increasing self-sufficiency, reconciliation, sober living, and healing.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.3%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2,807.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.3% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $69K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.