Ywca Helena

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810235416
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Helena, MT, USA
Phone
4064428774
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,263,035
Expenses
$1,295,312
Assets
$3,743,153
Liabilities
$99,771

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BECKY LAWSON (PRESIDENT)
  • ABIGAIL BROWN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DENISE KING (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DENISE KING (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $85,981 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ywca helena prevents homelessness, provides safe and supportive housing for women and children experiencing homelessness, and provides services that restores hope, self-sufficiency, and happy and healthy lives. Together with ywca USA and ywcas across the country, we are dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

What it reported doing in 2025

2025 wings - through the ywca helena's women initiating new growth and stability (wings), we aim to address housing insecurity, addiction, mental health, recidivism, and food insecurity, stemming from generational trauma and poverty. While our 117-year-old historic residence and services are in lewis & clark county, our wings program has statewide outreach in providing residential and intensive outpatient services for extremely low-income women, who are diagnosed with co-occuring mental health disorder, substance use disorder (sud) and are at immediate risk of homelessness. In 2025, we served 32 women, 17 children (in full time residency) and 7 children (in part time residency as part of their reunification process). Individuals came from 13 counties across Montana of which 31% are from rural communities and 41% are enrolled tribal members. One hundred percent of our intakes came from inpatient treatment and 81% of our residents are justice system involved; 100% of the women (19-67 years of age), live below the federal poverty level. Wings continues to be the only program in our community serving women of any age, any family status, where children of any age and any gender can live with their mothers. Once the mother is stabilized in her recovery, her children are welcome to join her in residence. Reunification with her child(ren) is supported with parenting classes and supervised visits. We have found reunification is vital to her recovery. Of the women served in 2025, 37% of women living in the home having children with them at least part time. Three women were pregnant or postpartum.women are required to attend mental health and substance use treatment five days a week. In 2025, all clients received an average of 256 therapy encounters per month. Successful graduates stay an average of 657 days before moving into community housing with sustained sobriety. Six women graduated the wings program and transitioned into community housing in 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 40
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 75
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 30.7%; rating input score 31
  • Program expense ratio: 53.7%; rating input score 54
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.8%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.89; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 30.7% of revenue deployed · 53.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $695K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $86K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.