Youth X Youth Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
863146030
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
2057063451
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development – Citizenship

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,075
Expenses
$61,864
Assets
$73,091
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Valentina Raman (Chief Executive Officer)

People named in this filing

  • Valentina Raman (Chief Executive Officer)
  • Jeremy Levine (Chief Financial Officer)
  • Erioluwa Adeyinka (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are an non-profit education organization that provides online and in-person programs and fellowships for global youth and adults seeking to learn how to create positive change in their lives, schools and communities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Organized and facilitated 10-month fellowship (Weavership) for 30 individuals committed to weaving their communities towards a more thriving world for all people and planet. Selected fellows organized global events and action circles with partners within and beyond the YouthxYouth community, and hosted in-person meetings in city Hubs to bring together youth and adults reimagining education in their local communities. Each fellow received $500 to support their learning and project development.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 26
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 24.3%; rating input score 24
  • Program expense ratio: 27.6%; rating input score 28

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.7%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 34% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 24.3% of revenue deployed · 27.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $17K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.