Youth Volunteer Corps of Greater Philadelphia Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813682529
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Chester Springs, PA, USA
Phone
2155124735
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Community Service Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,300
Expenses
$62,159
Assets
$8,254
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Greg Lynch (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Greg Lynch (Executive Director)
  • Karen Thomas (Director)
  • Jessica Jiang (Interim Chairman)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Youth Volunteer Corps of Greater Philadelphia creates volunteer opportunities to address community needs and to inspire youth for a lifetime commitment to service.

What it reported doing in 2022

In 2021, Youth Volunteer Corps of Greater Philadelphia engaged 139 youth volunteers ages 11-18 in 84 service projects completed on behalf of local agencies and communities throughout our region and contributed 1230 total hours of service to the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 88.7%; rating input score 89

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 58.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.2% of revenue deployed · 88.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.