Youth Speak Collective
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270126980
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Pacoima, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8188902928
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Arts Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $641,890
- Expenses
- $538,755
- Assets
- $271,522
- Liabilities
- $11,042
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Youth Speak Collective is a youth driven initiative empowering low income communities in the northeast San Fernando Valley with the skills necessary to pursue higher education and create strong communities.
What it reported doing in 2010
Creative Tech Center The Creative Tech Center is a space where youth and the community build their computer literacy through innovative project based learning curricula and student driven projects. One of the programs is the Mural Design program, designed to teach participant basic art and urban design concepts. YSC also provides training in internet broadband technology as well as basic computer skills for at-risk youth and low income families in Pacoima. Our studio programs engage students in learning by offering free classes in graphic design, web design, digital photography and video production. The Creative Tech Center is a full access computer lab and meeting space that is open to the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.1%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.5; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.1%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $493K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.