Youth Service Bureau of Jay County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 351468539
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Portland, IN, USA
- Phone
- 2607268520
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,474,826
- Expenses
- $1,853,149
- Assets
- $5,604,865
- Liabilities
- $165,713
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOUG LOY (PRESIDENT)
- PHILLIP J CORWIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- DAVID HAINES (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PHILLIP J CORWIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $92,205 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Assist at-risk children, youth and families in acheiving their greatest potential.
What it reported doing in 2024
Karss - keeping at risk students in school (karss) is a cooperative effort between the jay school corporation and the organization. The program was designed to retain suspended and expelled students in school, and reduce the dropout rate for these at-risk students. Karss, (pronounced 'cars') works with the student and his/her family as applicable to identify behavioral concerns, address academic and individual interests of the student, and provide opportunities to develop a sense of volunteerism so he/she will continue a regular school routine, successfully graduate, and have opportunities for individual growth. The opportunities in the community to develop an awareness of service to others is a strong component provided through the agencies that assist in mentoring the youth receiving and participating in this program. Community based services - children in the middle was established through a request by the jay county leadership academy in 1995. This program is available to those parents going through a divorce. Local and surrounding superior and circuit courts require divorcing parents to attend these classes. Parents are provided information and are able to discuss with other parents the following: ways to minimize the impact of divorce on the children, teaching parents how to avoid the common pitfalls associated with the divorce process, and how to effectively reassure their children as they adjust to the changes in their lives.base (behavioral academic and social education) is a joint venture between youth service bureau of jay county, inc. And greater randolph interlocal cooperative. This program is designed to target at risk students. It focuses on behavior modification with an education emphasis, and includes individual counseling, mentoring, and a family component.safe place is an outreach program that educates young people and the community about the dangers of running away or trying to resolve difficult, threatening situations on their own. A focus is to create a network of safe place locations to provide safe havens and resources for youth in crisis. Within this program are services directed toward those who are victims of human sex trafficking.outpatient counseling - the youth service bureau offers outpatient counseling services by our licensed mental health providers to adults, adolescents, children, and families. Individual and family counseling is provided at the youth service bureau office, and may be available in the school setting, to meet the needs of the families we serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25.1%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.02; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 87.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $92K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.