Youth Pride Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
050478645
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Providence, RI, USA
Phone
4014215626
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hot Line, Crisis Intervention Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$951,843
Expenses
$866,789
Assets
$675,877
Liabilities
$246,562

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUSHELLE FRAZIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • RUSHELLE FRAZIER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $108,761 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Youth pride, inc.'s mission is to meet the unique, ongoing needs of lgbtqia2s+ youth and young adults through direct service, support, advocacy, and education.

What it reported doing in 2025

Youth pride, inc. Is a nonprofit in Rhode Island specifically dedicated to meeting the needs of lgbtqia2s+ youth 24 and under. Our mission is to meet the unique, ongoing needs of lgbtq+ youth and young adults through direct service, support, advocacy, and education. In 2025: - our drop-in center and connected basic needs pantry (which provides food, clothes, toiletries, and school supplies) serviced more than 900 youth and gave out more than 7,000 lbs of goods. - secured a "winter response" grant that allowed us to operate as a warming center over the winter of 2025-2026. This grant not only allowed us to expand our hours and keep youth warm, but also increase the hours of one part time staff member to full time. - thanks to a successful year of fundraising, and with the support of grants new england and the commitment of ypi's staff and board, we achieved a historic milestone by establishing a $1 million budget for the first time. - we were able to distribute $71,153.73 in housing assistance to youth through the youth homelessness demonstration program; a u.s. Department of housing and urban development (hud) initiative/grant. We're had this grant for 3 years and this was our most successful yeast to date. - every wednesday we host "queer gourmet: where youth learn cooking skills (such as knife skills, seasoning, food budgeting, etc.) in our kitchen while learning a new recipe. Typically this program is run by staff, but in 2025 we were able to secure several guest chefs from the community to join us; some guest chefs include professionals from brightstar (formerly igt) and johnon and wales university.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.7%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 90.4%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $27.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.5%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.7% of revenue deployed · 90.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $784K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $109K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.