Youth Outright Wnc Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205675764
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Asheville, NC, USA
Phone
8668813721
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$489,293
Expenses
$356,404
Assets
$339,849
Liabilities
$3,723

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • EMMA ANDERSON (COEXECUTIVE): $58,293 total reported compensation
  • REBECCA BECK MARTENS 61-123124 (COEXECUTIVE): $55,637 total reported compensation
  • ADRIAN PARRA 101-53124 (EXECUTIVE DI): $31,462 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to create a world in which all queer and trans youth are supported to realize their power and autonomy through self-determination. We help youth resist oppression by building community, healing, and growing together. Youth outright engages in intersectional and intergenerational dialogue with a focus on gender and racial justice. Our work includes programming for youth ages 11-24, training for youth- serving organizations, and advocacy for policies that protect queer and trans youth.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, youth outright saw great growth, adapted to changes, and overcame unique challenges. We started the year by moving into the tzedek social justice funds building, where staff would have offices and our programs would have a home base in their community room. We increased our in-person programs from one per month to one per week on wednesdays. Our programs team worked to strengthen our curricular offerings, including topics like binary mapping, zine making for social change, neurodivergence and queerness, social justice history, and so much more. Offering more programs at a consistent location led to increased participation and greater exposure for our organization. For the first two quarters of 2024, we evaluated youth needs and developed a clearer vision for what a queer and trans youth center could offer this region. We also hired a communications intern to meet the need for more marketing to reach our core audience. At the end of may, our executive director of six years moved on to a position at the gsa network, with which we work closely in our role as the gsa network of North Carolina. In 2024, we had over 170 gsa clubs registered with us throughout the state, which we support through curricular resources, trainings, and advocacy. In the midst of a significant staffing transition, our staff and board of directors had transparent and honest conversations about next steps. We decided that, instead of conducting an executive director search, we redirected resources to opening a youth center and addressing staff pay equity. Now all of our staff make the same base pay, and we are a livable wage certified. We named our programs director and fund development director as interim co-executive directors for the remainder of the year. Under new leadership and with the seeds of opening a center planted, new collaborations and initiatives were emerging. Youth outright initiated a formal two-year partnership with clemson university's reyse program, which provided the organization with impactful, peer-reviewed insights into our programming, as well as programmatic support. In june, we kicked off pride month by hosting our 13th annual queer youth prom where we welcomed nearly 200 lgbtqia+ youth to a fantasy themed night of fun. This is one of our most cherished events and provides young queer and trans people with a safe, affirming space to experiece a prom with their peers. Our annual stonewall pride family picnic concluded the month of celebrations with a drag story hour, picnic, and activities in the park. With a center on the horizon, we saw a need for more program staffing. The youth fellowship, in turn, became two part-time program associate positions. We also transitioned our communications intern into a communication manager role to help increase awareness of our work. As youth outright grew organizationally, we sought to establish new avenues for youth voices to guide our work. We developed our first youth advisory board, which helped shape the design of our new programming, ensuring that our work was both youth-led and youth-focused. This board is paid for their time and commitment to shaping the future of our organization. After 15 years of youth outright primarily operating as a remote organization, our dream of acquiring an lgbtqia+ youth center came to fruition in july 2024. We spent two months seeking in-kind donations, building furniture, and decorating a seven-room space to serve as an affirming hub for our programs and services. We hired an operations manager in august to help run the center and increase staff capacity. On september 9th, we opened our doors to the first and only queer and trans youth center in the 18-county region of western North Carolina (wnc). We began offering two drop-in days per week in addition to our weekly programs. We are proud that all of our programs and services are completely free to youth thanks to the support of donors. As we were getting our footing, wnc was hit by one of the mo

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54.8%; rating input score 55
  • Program expense ratio: 75.2%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.93 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.2%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 40.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54.8% of revenue deployed · 75.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $268K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.