Youth Mentoring Connection
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954845105
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3236488548
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,323,150
- Expenses
- $1,940,553
- Assets
- $2,790,477
- Liabilities
- $1,587,087
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TONY LORE (DIRECTOR/CEO/FOUNDER)
Highest reported compensation
- TONY LORE (DIRECTOR/CEO/FOUNDER): $132,714 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of youth mentoring connection is to transform the lives of at-risk youth by caring for their wounds and shining a light on their gifts through an ongoing mentoring community, creative expression, and life-changing experiences; thus inspiring them to become thriving adults. Our vision is of a community that brings vital connection, love, and healing into the lives of at-risk youth.
What it reported doing in 2024
For the year ended june 30, 2025, over 325 vulnerable youth were provided with core mentoring and positive youth development activities. Youth were matched with caring adult mentors who empowered them with long-term and consistent support to build resiliency through ymc's gift centered approach. In addition to core mentoring, ymc provided other positive youth development programs including echo, urban oasis film academy, stoked city surf camp, year-round sunday surf, rites-of-passage annual retreat, and youth support. Ymc also hosted events focusing on positive youth development, open to former, current and prospective mentees.ymc deepened its recent partnerships with local schools, including options for youth, thomas jefferson high school, new open world academy, and the seed la school. Our corporate and community partners included synergy, shout factory, i have a dream la, home boys industries, street poets, rhythm arts alliance, wellnest, twin town treatment center, and youth build. An additional partnership with friends of the children la, focused on individual mentoring of black male youth who are struggling in the foster system.ymc's youth outcomes remain consistent year after year with youth achieving the following: 91% high school graduation rate among high school seniors; 82% of those enrolling in college or trade school. In the four key social emotional learning domains, 84% improved communication; 83% have stronger decision-making skills; 92% increased resiliency; and 88% have greater feelings of self-worth. Ymc also fully opened our urban oasis youth center (uoyc), creating a drop-in center for youth, and holding regular events to engage local young people to build a new community. Our resource coordinator provided valuable connections for those in need of services outside of what we directly provide, and we reached outside of our immediate community to provide material & financial support for victims of the eaton & palisades fires. We piloted a life-skills workshop called grow, addressing various topics including problem-solving skills, job readiness, health education and money management. Our long-time partners street poets and rhythm arts alliance also began monthly workshops in the space, providing creative expression through poetry and african drumming circles and dance. We also laid the groundwork to begin in-house counseling services with one of our own staff members who recently completed her mft, and with a usc master's student who secured a placement with us for their internship.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 69.2%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -46.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.44; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 69.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.