Youth For Christ-Wichita Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 481058535
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wichita, KS, USA
- Phone
- 3166165000
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development – Religious Leadership
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $274,105
- Expenses
- $275,350
- Assets
- $139,262
- Liabilities
- $15,721
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Don Cary (board chair)
- C A Cofer (secretary)
- Wayne Huxman (treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Youth evangelism
What it reported doing in 2024
Campus life comobines healthy relationships with creative programs to help young people make good choices, establish a solid foundation for life and positively impact their schools. Campus life is a place for middle or high school students to have fun, make friends and talk about matters to other middle or high school students. Campus life provides a balanced approach - physical, mental, social and spiritual - to give pre-teens and teens the skills and hope they need to live in a turbulent world. The purpose of city life is to help young people to develop attitudes and behavior patterns that allow them to function more constructively in society. The City Life work program emphasis the following: 1. Teaching basic life skills, work ethic and employment responsibility. 2. Providing an opportunity for a relationship with a caring adult role model. 3. Promoting and developing positive self-image through Jesus Christ. 4. Creating opportunities for positive peer group experiences. 5. Sharing the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. While all of the Youth for Christ ministires share the same purpose, they meet and interact with students in different areas. City Life meets young people in ther neighborhood or small community, many of whom are at risk and have already had some form of contact with the justice system. Juvenile Justice, through institutions or social service agency contacts, connects trained adults with young poeple to help them make good choices and establish a solid foundation in life. Parent Life connects trained adults with pregnant girls and teenage parents in programs designed to help them make good choices and establish a sold foundation, not only in their lives, but also in the lives of their babies. Every ministry of Youth for Christ seeks to engage young people wherever they are found as life-long followers of Jesus Christ.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.4%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 50.1%; rating input score 50
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.4% of revenue deployed · 50.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.