Youth Experience Sponsorship

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991400600
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Novato, CA, US
Phone
415-279-5145
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$552,044
Expenses
$74,828
Assets
$534,957
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL GLASSER (PRESIDENT)
  • RAFAEL VELEZ (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL GLASSER (PRESIDENT)
  • TRICIA ANDERSON (TREASURER)
  • REBECCA VINEYARD GLASSER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Opening doors, building confidence, and supporting youth for life.

What it reported doing in 2025

During 2025, youth experience sponsorship ("yes") sponsored 39 individual youth through 59 enrichment experiences and awarded $43,146 in sponsorship grants. These opportunities included educational programs, tutoring, sports teams, camps, arts programs, and other youth development experiences. Youth choose the experience; yes simply helps remove the financial barrier. By connecting donor dollars to real-time family needs, yes partnered with and paid 23 different organizations providing services across a broad range of disciplines and interests.youth experience sponsorship ("yes") is a California nonprofit organization that removes financial barriers so motivated, under-resourced youth can access enriching experiences in athletics, arts, education, and other aspirational endeavors. Yes serves youth and families throughout marin, sonoma, and san mateo counties by sponsoring experiences of their choosing and paying approved organizations directly. We do not claim to know which experience may become meaningful or life-changing for a young person. Our role is simply to create access to more opportunities during the finite years of childhood, when those opportunities matter most.to ensure accountability, yes pays approved organizations directly rather than providing funds to families. We meet families where they are, support them through the application and experience processes, verify eligibility and participation, and remain flexible as interests and needs evolve. Families may apply for additional or different experiences over time, allowing sponsorships to adapt in real time. This approach enables yes to efficiently connect donor dollars to youth opportunities while allowing parents, coaches, teachers, and partner organizations to focus on what they do best: delivering the experiences.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 96% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 34
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 92
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 9.2%; rating input score 9
  • Program expense ratio: 60.1%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: $56.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 86.4%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.15; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 137.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 161% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 9.2% of revenue deployed · 60.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $45K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.