Youth Education and Social Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273859079
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Mesa, AZ, USA
Phone
4806888455
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$63,600
Expenses
$25,436
Assets
$144,306
Liabilities
$422

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MEGAN MCGLYNN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MEGAN MCGLYNN (PRESIDENT)
  • ALLAN PALMER (OFFICER)
  • CHERIE H MCGLYNN (CHAIRMAN)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Youth education and social services (yess) was created to fill an identified void in available services for at-risk youth in Arizona. Our mission is to improve the outcomes of at-risk youth by improving the chances that they will stay in school, graduate and ultimately become productive, contributing members of our community.

What it reported doing in 2020

Facilitates parenting groups and special education services at the maricopa county jails. Facilitates parenting groups to highlight the importantance of nurturing youth and how parents can facilitate positive development in their children. Provider of special education services for youth in the maricopa county jails. Incldues a cognitive program, designed to have group participant examine thinking patters and develop a more positive thinking pattern by using the cognative model.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.2%; rating input score 36
  • Program expense ratio: 90.6%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 60%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.67; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -55.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -8.1% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 38.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.2% of revenue deployed · 90.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $23K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 36/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.