Youth and Family Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942793548
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Inverness, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4156691532
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $481,082
- Expenses
- $602,848
- Assets
- $631,888
- Liabilities
- $1,127,656
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Robin Gross (President)
- Randolph Thomas MD (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Robin Gross (President)
- Randolph Thomas MD (Vice President)
- Jeffrey Fairchild (Sec / Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to strengthen families and communities, foster neighborhood building behaviors among youth and families, improve mental health and reduce substance abuse.
What it reported doing in 2014
ADULT RECOVERY - GENDER SPECIFICState Certified Outpatient Substance Disorder Treatment and EducationAdult outpatient treatment services are provided separately for men and women. These gender specific programs include comprehensive treatment for adults and their families aimed at helping them recover from chemical dependency. This program specializes in helping men and women address substance and related issues such as: family and partner violence, post traumatic stress disorders, incarceration and re-entry, health and nutrition, emotional concerns, and sexuality. Services include assessing and assisting with education goals, and/or employment search
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 88% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $75.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.78; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $512K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.