Youth Alternatives Ingraham

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010316041
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Portland, ME, USA
Phone
2075235021
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Development N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$10,637,933
Expenses
$11,290,237
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Youth Alternatives Ingraham partners with communities and individuals to deliver a full spectrum of social services and mental health care that begins prenatally and continues throughout the lifespan with programs that advance healthier lives, happier families, and stronger communities.

What it reported doing in 2012

Multidimensional Treatment Foster CareMultidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC) is an alternative to corrections and group care facilities. As researched and developed by the Oregon Social Learning Center, MTFC places juvenile offenders who need residential treatment with foster families who are trained to provide close supervision, fair limits, consistent consequences and a supportive relationship. Research on MTFC programs in this country has proven it to be a cost effective and efficacious approach. Within the MTFC model, a youth's program can be individualized to fit his or her needs, challenges and strengths. Rather than placing them in group settings, MTFC places carefully selected youth in a family setting away from peers who have similar problems and may provide negative influence. This promotes learning and adjustment within a normalizing family setting. Number of clients served: 5Expense: $159,978Children's Case Management ProgramThe Children's Case Management Program is intended to be grounded in the wraparound process and to embrace the concept of child and family centered planning. Case managers assist families to enhance their independence and self-determination in meeting the therapeutic needs of the child. The case managers serve small areas in both York and Cumberland counties. Number of clients served: 317Expense: $592,971Young Parent ProgramA parenting education program for young parents who are pregnant, parenting, and or working on reunification, we partner with young parents to support healthy attachments, child development, and connection to community. The Community Outreach portion of this program provides community outreach for parents 22 and under which includes: family centered case management; prenatal education; infant and toddler development; and parenting classes. The transitional housing portion of this program is open to people ages 22 and under who are currently homeless. It includes transitional living with 6 apartments; home visits; parenting classes; access to support groups; educational, vocational, and housing resources; counseling and case management; as well as referrals. Expense: $146,393EdgewoodA six bed residential treatment program for youth ages 16 to 21 who are attempting to become more independent within the community as adults. Number of clients served: 7Expense: $436,345Community Support ServicesAdult case management services for adults with mental illness or co-occurring disorder of a mental illness and a substance abuse disorder. Service planning is individualized to the client needs and desires. Treatment is outcome focused and builds on the client's existing strengths in developing new skills for maintaining stability in the client's community and natural supports. Core areas of service include: engagement, assessment, individual service planning, implementation, crisis intervention and prevention, and advocacy. Number of clients served: 557Expense: $823,884The BridgeA twelve bed emergency short term residence for homeless adults with a major mental illness and/or a substance abuse disorder, providing a safe, supportive environment, comprehensive treatment and connection to community resources. Service planning is highly collaborative with other community providers so as to secure a more stable living environment and ongoing needed treatment after discharge. The goal of the program is to stabilize the mental health needs. Number of clients served: 26Expense: $429,739Ray HouseA seven bed comprehensive treatment residence providing treatment, support and advocacy for adults with severe and persistent mental illness. The goal of the program is to maintain clients within the community and reduce the need for psychiatric hospitalization through building coping and daily living skills. Number of clients served: 8Expense: $366,590Morrison PlaceA twelve bed treatment facility offering intensive individualized treatment of homeless adults with co-occurring mental health and subs

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95.2%; rating input score 95; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -40.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 20 of 21 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $197K · 23 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2012
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.