YAMM - Youth Achieving Moral Maturity
Legal name: Youth Achieving Moral Maturity Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814965735
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Winston-Salem, NC, US
- Phone
- 336-705-6322
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Prison Alternatives
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,467
- Expenses
- $3,366
- Assets
- $331
- Liabilities
- $882
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KAMM GALLOWAY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KAMM GALLOWAY (PRESIDENT)
- EQUILLA CHAMBERS (TREASURER)
- DR MARCUS BARR (CHAIRMAN)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To help vulnerable youth by creating effective advancing economic opportunity solutions that help them become self-sufficient.
What it reported doing in 2024
Natures family- in june 2024 the natures family program hosted a four-day outdoor camping event engaging 36 participants from 9 families. The event focused on teaching essential life skills exploring nature-based careers building teamwork and relieving stress. 80 learned skills like fishing and handling outdoor emergencies. 60 explored careers in outdoor-related fields. 90 improved teamwork skills. 75 gained tools to manage stress through nature. This event supported economic mobility by teaching practical skills and opening pathways to new careers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 36.9%; rating input score 37
- Program expense ratio: 38%; rating input score 38
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.66; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.4% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -32.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 36.9% of revenue deployed · 38% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.