Your Health Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461962771
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2016
Forms available
Form 990 2016
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Phone
4434750990
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,475,894
Expenses
$3,647,044
Assets
$1,878,143
Liabilities
$6,318,224

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Peter L Beilenson MD MPH (Director, President, Chair)
  • Elizabeth Burger (Executive Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • MELISSA DELONG (Physician): $213,338 total reported compensation
  • ADANMA NDUBUIZU (Physician): $180,571 total reported compensation
  • AARON GREENBLATT (Physician): $122,600 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide patient-centered high quality health and wellness services that deeply engage and empower Marylanders to be stewards of their own health, with the desired impact of healthier communities and the reduction of health disparities.

What it reported doing in 2016

In the 2015 tax year, the staff of the organization conducted the following core activities - provision of patient care, with extremely positive initial patient feedback and clinical outcomes that suggest that this model is, indeed, outperforming peer health care providers. For example, initial data suggests that the organization has been able to reduce unnecessary emergency room (ER) utilization relative to other commercially insured individuals - outreach to communities to raise awareness about the new offering-collaboration with public health officials and other non-profits to inform plans and lay the groundwork for collaboration-contracting with Medicaid managed care organizations(MCOS) to provide medical care to Medicaid participants, including those who benefited from Maryland's expansion of the Medicaid program-contracting with the Maryland's Veteran's Administration(VA) to provide primary care services to veterans who would otherwise experience long wait times to get an appointment at a VA facility (by taking on these patients (and doing so quickly), we are certainly providing a public service to our country's veterans, thus relieving federal burden in a way that has no private interest and is consistent with our desire to serve individuals regardless of economic strata or type of insurance coverage)-development of partnership with the Howard County Local Health Improvement Coalitions(LHICS) to improve access to high quality primary care for vulnerable Howard County residents-expansion of our health coaching program to include free crisis intervention services for patients-ongoing development/expansion of our mental health services to provide more intensive services(i.e. psychotherapy) to patients whose mental health needs extend beyond the initial scope of services-outreach to patients who are not actively accessing primary care medical care services to encourage them to schedule preventive office visits-participation in a grant program by the horizon foundation that enable us to fund a health coach position. The health coach provided free preventive health coaching and behavioral health support to patients of the Howard County-based office-early planning for several initiatives that will be implemented in 2015/16, including but not limited to-group health support and disease education on health topics such as smoking cessation, diabetes management, stress and anxiety management, parenting-medication assistance program to help low-income commercially insured patients with chronic diseases afford medication where a financial barrier(e.g.co-insurance, pre-deductible out of pocket requirement) would otherwise prevent filling of a prescription-partnership with psychiatrists to increase access to psychiatry for our patients via tele-consultation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.4%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.5%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.36; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 20.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 73.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.4% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $213K · 13 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.