Young Womens Christian Association of North Orange County
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951687482
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
- Location
- Fullerton, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7148714488
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $80,219
- Expenses
- $92,204
- Assets
- $502,218
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROSALINA CAMACHO (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROSALINA CAMACHO (PRESIDENT)
- NOEL BURCH (1ST VP)
- ROSAMARIA GOMEZ-AMARO (2ND VP)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the ywca of north orange county is to eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. We accomplish our mission by connecting generations of women by addressing their changing needs, through strategic partnerships, we equip individuals to achieve and maintain social, physical, financial, intellectual, and spiritual well being.
What it reported doing in 2024
Youth empowerment services: this program addresses racial disparities and promotes economic empowerment by working with multicultural, under-served youth,14-22 years. Ninety 85% are minorities from low income to extremely low income families and approximately 78% of students reside in households with 4-9 persons depending on very low earned income. The majority have little or limited access to computers to apply for jobs on line. Our youth employment services gives them access to employment and career opportunities, resume building, interview skills, volunteer opportunities, computer literacy skills resulting in admission to local community colleges, regional occupational programs or job placement with a local employer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 80.5%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.9%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.45; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -10.6% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 95.1% of revenue deployed · 80.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $74K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.